MODEL UNCERTAINTY, ROBUST POLICIES, AND THE VALUE OF COMMITMENT

Kenneth Kasa

Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2002, vol. 6, issue 1, 145-166

Abstract: Using results from the literature on H∞ control, this paper incorporates model uncertainty into a frequency-domain approach to stabilization policy. The derived policies guarantee a minimum performance level even in the worst of (a bounded set of) circumstances. Robust H∞ policies are shown to be more “activist” than H2 policies in the sense that their impulse responses are larger. Robust policies also tend to be more autocorrelated. Consequently, the premium associated with being able to commit is greater under model uncertainty. Without commitment, the policymaker is not able to (credibly) smooth his response to the degree that he would like. A contribution of this paper is its analysis of robust control in a model featuring a forward-looking state transition equation, which arises from the fact that the private sector bases its decisions on expectations of future government policy. Existing applications of H∞ control in economics follow the engineering literature, and only consider backward-looking state transition equations.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Model uncertainty, robust policies, and the value of commitment (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:6:y:2002:i:01:p:145-166_02

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Macroeconomic Dynamics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().