Epistemic Methodological Deconceptualization of Health Security

Albert Moritis Oti Agyemang (), Gloria Assuah () and Nana Owusu Boampong ()

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 2026, vol. 11, issue 7, 330-334

Abstract: This paper examines how the executive positions of stakeholders and intellectual pride strip science of its intellectual framework and independence, thereby politicizing health systems for personal and localized interests. Executive privilege is deployed politically to undermine scientific integrity, prioritizing either the specific interests of key stakeholders or poorly integrated interdisciplinary programs. Intellectual pride frequently extends beyond specialty and epistemic domains, misleading global responses, as demonstrated during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. While interdisciplinary collaboration is accepted within contemporary intellectual fields, it must never serve as a rhetorical cloak for speaking authoritatively outside one’s scope of competence. Furthermore, institutional restructuring should not target a methodological flattening—an epistemic strategy used to subordinate empirical evidence for political gains.  Methodology: This study employs a conceptual-hermeneutic framework and structural analysis to evaluate the interface between public health governance, political influence, and epistemic validation. By analyzing systemic and historical case studies—specifically the global institutional responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and national-level policy implementations such as Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and Free Education School-Feeding policy—the paper models how political and financial variables distort scientific outcomes. To avoid ending up in epistemic luck, policy implementations must be considered within comprehensive contextual frameworks. Obscuring any part of stakeholder involvement worsens systemic outcomes; neglecting funding or key stakeholder dynamics increases the probability that implementations will be brushed off or undermined, particularly when empirical data contradicts political desires. To prevent the decontextualization of health system projects, political involvement must be integrated at the very beginning of programs alongside a constitutionally mandated institutional conscience keeper. Finally, epistemic humility must synthesize all operational narratives to prioritize common ground between genuine executive priorities and broader public considerations.

Keywords: Epistemic Deconceptualization; Specialty and Executive Privilege; Stakeholder’s Consideration; Political Methodology; Intellectual Pride; Conscience Keeper; Policy; Governance; Public Health; Global Health; Implementation; Health Administration; KATH. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ijisrt.com/epistemic-methodological-de ... n-of-health-security (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cvr:ijisrt:2026:7:ijisrt26jul466

DOI: 10.38124/ijisrt/26jul466

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) from IJISRT Publication
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rahul Goyel ().