Ethics, bias and regulation of artificial intelligence in dentistry
Youris Samón Mayan and
Marta María Capote Fernández
SAP Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry, 2025
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence is transforming dentistry, but its adoption raises ethical, bias-related, and regulatory questions that the accuracy-focused literature has left largely unexamined. This narrative review synthesizes the ethical dimensions of dental artificial intelligence across five axes: algorithmic bias and fairness, ethical principles, regulation and governance, data privacy and consent, and accountability and liability. The review draws on sources published up to 2025 and on the broader medical artificial intelligence literature. Dental models inherit demographic and acquisition biases from their training data, and fairness metrics are rarely reported. The principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice apply directly, and trustworthy use requires explainability and transparency. Regulatory frameworks are emerging but heterogeneous, and dental tools sit uneasily between medical device and general software regulation. Data governance, informed consent, and the allocation of responsibility for model errors remain unresolved. The review concludes that the clinical value of dental artificial intelligence will depend as much on resolving these dimensions as on further gains in accuracy.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://southam.pub/journals/files/aid/aid202528en.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cwf:aidart:aid202528
DOI: 10.62486/aid202528
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in SAP Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry from South American Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by South American Publishing Journals Manager ().