Panel Data Analysis of the Impact of Larger State Size/Land Area on Voter Turnout in US Presidential Elections: 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012

Richard Cebula ()

Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), 2017, vol. 63, issue 3, 319-340

Abstract: This study has two objectives, both of which seek to provide insights into factors that influenced the voter participation rate in general elections in the US in recent years. The principal objective of this study is to proffer and then empirically investigate the following hypothesis: the voter participation rate of registered voters is reduced by greater state size (in squares miles) because, other things held the same, greater state size increases the transactions costs of voting for many of those persons who prefer to cast a ballot in person rather than by mail. A focus on this variable is unique in the literature. The secondary general objective of this study is to identify other factors that influenced the voter participation rate in recent years. The study adopts a state-level panel dataset and reports both Cross-section Random-effects estimations and dynamic panel estimations (Panel GMM estimates) for the first four US Presidential elections years of the 21st century, i.e., 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012. After allowing for a variety of variables in the model, it is found that a 10,000 square mile greater size for a state in turn implies 0.148%-0.156% lower voter turnout, whereas a 100,000 square mile greater state size implies a 1.48%-1.56% lower voter turnout. Furthermore, the study finds that the voter participation rate of registered voters was an increasing function of six other factors: the unemployment rate, the percent of the population that earned a high school diploma or more, election competitiveness, median family income, and the percentage of the population that was either Afro-American/black or Hispanic/Latin.

Keywords: voter participation rate; state land area; expected costs of voting; educational attainment; unemployment; minority status; election competitiveness; income (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.63.3.319 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2008 onwards); Pay-per-view access from https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/journals/aeq (2008 onwards) and http://www.genios.de (2008 onwards)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dah:aeqaeq:v63_y2017_i3_q3_p319-340

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.duncker-humblot.de/zeitschriften/aeq

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik) is currently edited by Cinzia Alcidi, Christian Dreger and Daniel Gros

More articles in Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik) from Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin
Bibliographic data for series maintained by E-Publishing-Team ().