The Complexity of Economies and Pluralism in Economics
Claudius Gräbner ()
Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 2017, vol. 137, issue 3, 193-225
From the two premises that (1) economies are complex systems and (2) the accumulation of knowledge about reality is desirable, I derive the conclusion that pluralism with regard to economic research programs is a more viable position to hold than monism. To substantiate this claim an epistemological framework of how scholars study their objects of inquiry and relate their models to reality is discussed. Furthermore, it is argued that given the current institutions of our scientific system, economics self-organizes towards a state of scientific unity. Since such a state is epistemologically inferior to a state of plurality, critical intervention is desirable.
JEL-codes: A1 A2 B4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2017 onwards); Pay-per-view access from https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/journals/schm (2017 onwards) and http://www.genios.de (2017 onwards)
Working Paper: The Complexity of Economies and Pluralism in Economics (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dah:aeqjce:v137_y2017_i3_q3_p193-225
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch is currently edited by Nils Goldschmidt, Erik Grimmer-Solem, Joachim Zweynert and Stefan Kolev
More articles in Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch from Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Bibliographic data for series maintained by E-Publishing-Team ().