The Complexity of Economies and Pluralism in Economics

Claudius Gräbner-Radkowitsch

Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 2017, vol. 137, issue 3, 193-225

Abstract: From the two premises that (1) economies are complex systems and (2) the accumulation of knowledge about reality is desirable, I derive the conclusion that pluralism with regard to economic research programs is a more viable position to hold than monism. To substantiate this claim an epistemological framework of how scholars study their objects of inquiry and relate their models to reality is discussed. Furthermore, it is argued that given the current institutions of our scientific system, economics self-organizes towards a state of scientific unity. Since such a state is epistemologically inferior to a state of plurality, critical intervention is desirable.

JEL-codes: A1 A2 B4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3790/jce.137.3.193 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Complexity of Economies and Pluralism in Economics (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dah:aeqjce:v137_y2017_i3_q3_p193-225

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.duncker-humblot.de/zeitschriften/jce

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch is currently edited by Peter J. Boettke, Nils Goldschmidt, Stefan Kolev, Stephen T. Ziliak and Joachim Zweynert

More articles in Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch from Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Bibliographic data for series maintained by E-Publishing-Team ().