Social Media, Humanism, and Democracy: The Role of TikTok in the 2024 Presidential Campaign in Mexico

Yolier Izquierdo Cuellar and Carlos Daniel Hernández Orozco
Additional contact information
Yolier Izquierdo Cuellar: Doctorado en Comunicación, Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México. México
Carlos Daniel Hernández Orozco: Licenciatura en Derecho y Criminología, Universidad Nacional “Rosario Castellanos”. México

Netnography, 2025, vol. 3, 110-110

Abstract: This article will address the use of TikTok as a political communication tool in Jorge Álvarez Máynez's presidential campaign in the 2024 Mexican elections. In a context of apathy toward traditional politics and the exponential growth of social media, TikTok is emerging as one of the main platforms in the electoral battlefield, where more than competing for ideas, it's competing for the attention of young audiences. Theoretical Foundation: The research is based on contributions from digital political communication, emotional technopolitics, and algorithm theory. Authors such as Castells (2009), Gerbaudo (2018, 2022), Cervi, Tejedor and Blesa (2023) and Rodríguez (2025) explain how digital environments reconfigure the political map, privileging aesthetics, charisma and virality over programmatic argumentation. Methodology: A qualitative content analysis was carried out on thirty videos officially published on Máynez's account, between March and May 2024. The speeches, performative elements, musical and humorous resources, as well as citizen interaction were studied, paying special attention to user reception and participation. Results: The campaign was characterized by a strategic and intensive use of the platform, with visual and emotional narratives that generated high levels of interaction. In a poorly regulated electoral environment, Máynez achieved an unprecedented communication advantage, driven by algorithms that favored performative and emotional discourses, giving her disproportionate visibility compared to her opponents. Conclusion: TikTok doesn't democratize, but rather personalizes; it doesn't equalize but fragments; and far from strengthening democratic deliberation, it displaces it toward an attention market dominated by algorithmic logic.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dbk:netnog:2025v3a110

DOI: 10.62486/net2025110

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Netnography from AG Editor (Uruguay)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Javier Gonzalez-Argote ().