REFLECTIONS UPON THE LEGAL NORM INCLUDED IN ARTICLE 215(2) LETTER D IN THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE IMPLICATIONS GENERATED BY ITS EQUIVOCAL CHARACTER

Corina-Cristina Buzdugan and Camelia Reghini

FIAT IUSTITIA, 2015, vol. 9, issue 2, 154-157

Abstract: Starting from a practical case, the article aims at submitting to examination the way, debatable in our opinion, in which the lawmaker has understood to regulate, in the context of legal supervision, the defendant’s obligation of non-communicating either directly or indirectly, by any means, with certain persons. More exactly, the purpose of our initiative is to underline the fact that the legal norm should have a predictable character, because, otherwise, it may generate consequences of a considerable gravity for the person it is addressed to.

Keywords: legal supervision; unconstitutionality; prohibition of communicating; predictability; legal norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ ... 46-1-10-20160315.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:154-157

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in FIAT IUSTITIA from Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania ().