Social and Regional Inequalities in the Sense of Safety in Germany
Anna Bindler and
Hannah Walther
DIW Weekly Report, 2025, vol. 15, issue 30, 179-187
Abstract:
The public’s perceived sense of safety influences many domains in significant ways: It impacts individual behavior, life quality, consumption behavior, and even political views as well as government action. Using data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and the German Federal Government’s 2024 Gleichwertigkeitsbericht (Equivalence Report), the development as well as the regional and social distribution of the sense of safety in Germany is analyzed. The results make it clear that not only does the fear of crime correlate with actual crime rates, but it can even increase independently of them. Such an increase can be seen during times of social upheaval. Regionally, there is a clear north-south divide: There is less crime in the south and people who live there feel safer than people living in the north. The fear of crime is distributed unevenly across society, particularly among vulnerable groups. People with a migration background tend to feel less safe. Young people, men, people with a university degree, or high-income earners are less concerned about crime trends. Responsible media coverage and a rational public discourse are important in order to prevent a growing gap between the public’s subjective perception of crime and the objective crime situation. Policymakers and the media should focus on informing the public rather than amplifying fears.
Keywords: crime; crime perceptions; public security; regional inequality; social inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J10 K14 K42 R19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.969698.de/dwr_25-30-1.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:diw:diwdwr:dwr15-30-1
Access Statistics for this article
DIW Weekly Report is currently edited by Tomaso Duso, Marcel Fratzscher, Peter Haan, Claudia Kemfert, Alexander Kritikos, Alexander Kriwoluzky, Stefan Liebig, Lukas Menkhoff, Karsten Neuhoff, Carsten Schröder, Katharina Wrohlich and Sabine Fiedler
More articles in DIW Weekly Report from DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bibliothek ().