Innovation Complementarity in a Vertically Differentiated Monopoly
Swapnendu Banerjee (Bandyopadhyay) ()
Indian Economic Review, 2013, vol. 48, issue 2, 263-274
In a vertically differentiated monopoly with continuous consumer types we show that a process innovation can precede and induce an otherwise unprofitable product (innovation), thus pointing towards a complementarity between these two types of innovation. With fixed innovation costs we show that this holds irrespective of whether we have full or partial market coverage. Also the social incentive to innovate under social planning is greater vis-a-vis the private incentive under monopoly.
Keywords: Process Innovation; Product Innovation; Complementarity; Continuous Consumer Types (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dse:indecr:0072
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Indian Economic Review is currently edited by Pami Dua (Editor) & Ram Singh (Associate Editor) and Sunil Kanwar
More articles in Indian Economic Review from Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pami Dua ().