EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Some Theoretical Issues Relating to Regulation: The Quasi Autonomous State

S. S. Sivakumar and B. Batavia
Additional contact information
S. S. Sivakumar: University of Madras
B. Batavia: De Paul University

Indian Economic Review, 1995, vol. 30, issue 1, 89-99

Abstract: Economics of regulation is often considered to be a branch of normative economies, dealing with the way regulatory policy could enhance the efficiency of second best economies. However, the positive theory of regulation seeks to explain regulation as the outcome of lobbying activity of industry (or sector) specific interest groups. This theory attempts to construct equilibrium models wherein the markets for "political goods" (i.e. regulation) clear. The present work attempts to explain situations of quantity-constraints in these markets, which lead to different levels of autonomy for the state vis-a-vis the interest groups. It is argued, that the behavior of transaction costs influences the degree of autonomy for the state.

JEL-codes: K20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dse:indecr:v:30:y:1995:i:1:p:89-99

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.ierdse.org/

Access Statistics for this article

Indian Economic Review is currently edited by Pami Dua (Editor) & Ram Singh (Associate Editor) and Sunil Kanwar

More articles in Indian Economic Review from Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pami Dua ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:dse:indecr:v:30:y:1995:i:1:p:89-99