Axiomatic Analysis of the Semi-Fuzzy Poverty Indices MIf and PGf
Majda Fikri () and
Mohammed El Khomssi ()
Additional contact information
Majda Fikri: RTZ Marocco
Mohammed El Khomssi: Marocco
Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, 2017, issue 13(4), 209-226
Every poverty index can be classified into one of the two major classes; classical indices and fuzzy indices; except for the semi-fuzzy poverty indices such as PGf and MIf which hybridize between the theory of classical sets and that of fuzzy sets, which makes their axiomatic analysis very special since it uses both classical and fuzzy mathematical tools. In order to better exploit and characterize the PGf and MIf indices, we propose in this paper an axiomatic analysis by mathematically demonstrating, on the one hand, the satisfaction of these two indices of a set of axioms most desirable by economists, which shows their performance in describing poverty. On the other hand, we discuss their limits according to three axioms that we demonstrate in order to improve the formula of these semi-fuzzy indices of poverty.
Keywords: Poverty measure; fuzzy set theory; confidence intervals; semi fuzzy poverty indices PGf and MIf; axiomatic analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2017:i:4:p:209-226
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica from Danubius University of Galati Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Daniela Robu ().