How Does Financial Risk Management Impact Financial Performance of Microfinance Banks?
Lukman Adebayo-Oke Abdulrauf (),
Sherifdeen Adebola Rabiu (),
Joseph Olorunfemi Akande () and
Adedeji Daniel Gbadebo ()
Additional contact information
Lukman Adebayo-Oke Abdulrauf: Kwara State University
Sherifdeen Adebola Rabiu: TAJ Bank LTD
Joseph Olorunfemi Akande: Walter Sisulu University
Adedeji Daniel Gbadebo: Walter Sisulu University
Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, 2024, issue 20(5), 118-135
Abstract:
Microfinance banks (MFBs) in Nigeria play an important role of delivering financial services to the underserved population and low-income individuals. MFBs are exposed to various financial risks, including borrower defaults and liquidity management, posing serious survival threats. We apply the autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) regression, on published data from 1993 to 2022, to confirm how financial risk management of the MFBs in Nigeria impacts their financial performance. The finding from the short run of the main (ROA) estimation identifies that except for the loan-deposit magnitude, which is insignificant, the coefficients on capital adequacy strength, risk asset quality, liquidity strength and loan loss provision are significant. For the long run, capital adequacy, liquidity, risk asset quality and loan loss provision have significant coefficient while loan-deposit magnitude has an insignificant coefficient. The lag term of error correction is negative (-1.60) and significant, implying that the model would converge to equilibrium upon any perturbation. Similar results are evident when the return on equity is considered as a measure of financial performance to verify the sensitivity of the outcomes. This suggests the estimation is not sensitive to any performance measure used. The findings underscore the importance of capital adequacy and liquidity strength for improving the financial performance as well as the detrimental impact of risk asset quality and high loan loss provisions on the MFBs. To ensure enhanced financial performance, sustainability and effectiveness, we recommend offer that policy markets should different regulatory measures including recapitalization, reshaping of risk asset holdings, regulating loan loss provisions, clarifying regulations on loan-deposit ratios, and regulating liquidity levels.
Keywords: Microfinance banks; financial risk management; financial performance; capital adequacy strength; risk asset quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/3012/2931 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2024:i:5:p:118-135
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica from Danubius University of Galati Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Daniela Robu ().