HÜSEYNÎ SONG BY HÂFIZ SÂDEDD?N KAYNAK RHYTHMIC ANALYSIS

Volkan GİDİŞ (), Ayşe Başak HARMANCI İlhan () and Hanefi Özbek ()
Additional contact information
Volkan GÄ°DÄ°Åž: Ä°stanbul Medipol Ãœniversitesi
AyÅŸe BaÅŸak HARMANCI Ä°lhan: Marmara Ãœniversitesi
Hanefi Özbek: İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi

Eurasian Art & Humanities Journal, 2019, vol. 11, issue 11, 51-66

Abstract: Usûl problems are encountered from time to time in the notes of Turkish Music works and problems related to the procedures cause difficulties in the performance of the works from the notes. The work is either incorrectly identified or incorrectly segmented. By reviewing the notes of Turkish Music works and correcting those who are wrong in terms of maqam, usûl or form, it will be possible to reach the correct forms of the works, and Turkish Music will be enriched with maqam, usûl and forms that have been forgotten or not yet realized in terms of usûl, maqam and form. In this study, Hüseynî song of Hâf?z Sâdeddin Kaynak was analyzed from the aspect of the usûlm and the method of the work was re-determined and the note of the song was written according to this method. For this purpose, Hâf?z Sâdeddin source's work was obtained from different sources and analyzed in terms of rhythm (usûl). The song, which started with the verse ?Ben bir çoban k?z?y?m?, belongs to Vecdi Bingöl and his composer Hâf?z Sâdeddin Kaynak was written in two different ways. The note obtained from the TRT note archive is indicated as ?Oynak+Sofyân?. This work has been shown as ?Aksak-Sofyân? in the publications of Emin Ongan Üsküdar Mûsiki Cemiyeti Ne?riyat? and ?zmit Büyük?ehir Musiki Derne?i. When Münir Nurettin Selçuk was listened to and re-noted from the voice of the work, it was understood that the work was a new usûl with nine strokes and five strokes arranged exclusively by Hâf?z Sâdeddin Kaynak. It was found that the part of the work that started with ?Hey da?lar?n meral?? verse started with the Düyek usûl and from time to time Sofyân and Düyek usûls were mixed. It was found that the section that started with ??n dallardan a?a??? verse was composed by the method at the beginning of the work. The determination and notation of the usûl of the work is wrong; it is concluded that the usûl of the work is a different 9-time procedure which has not been used in another work before. The note of the work was rewritten according to the corrected usûl.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/arthum/article/view/591 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eas:arthum:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:51-66

DOI: 10.17740/eas.art.2019�V11�05

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Eurasian Art & Humanities Journal from Eurasian Academy Of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kutluk Kagan Sumer ().