EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Profit-Sharing and Productivity: Some Further Evidence

John Cable and Nicholas Wilson

Economic Journal, 1990, vol. 100, issue 401, 550-55

Abstract: New estimates for West Germany indicate overall productivity differentials of 20-30 percent in favor of firms practicing profit sharing. These compare with estimates of 3-8 percent for comparable British firms reported in a recent issue. Like the U.K. results, they reveal important interactions between profit sharing and other firm-specific characteristics, reinforcing the view that profit sharing be regarded as an integral element of overall organizational design. But the fact that in Germany profit sharing is apparently used in a different way than in the United Kingdom by different kinds of firms, suggests that there is no single, uniquely appropriate context and role for profit sharing. Copyright 1990 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819900 ... 0.CO%3B2-E&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:100:y:1990:i:401:p:550-55

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:100:y:1990:i:401:p:550-55