EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Economic Fluctuations Really Persistent? A Reinterpretation of Some International Evidence

D Demery and N W Duck

Economic Journal, 1992, vol. 102, issue 414, 1094-101

Abstract: In this paper, the authors show that estimates of J. H. Cochrane's (1988) suggested measure of the persistence of fluctuations in real output will be biased if there is a single break in the mean rate of growth of output. The authors then show that the major findings of J. Y. Campbell and N. G. Mankiw (1989)--that for a number of industrial countries estimates of Cochrane's measure of persistence are generally very high though different and that a subgroup of countries with high output persistence have low relative output persistence--can be largely accounted for by the difference in each country between its pre-1974 and post-1973 mean growth rates. Copyright 1992 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819920 ... 0.CO%3B2-V&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:414:p:1094-101

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:414:p:1094-101