Futures versus Share Contracting as Means of Diversifying Output Risk

David Hirshleifer and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam

Economic Journal, 1993, vol. 103, issue 418, 620-38

Abstract: Two means by which commodity producers can reduce their exposure to quantity risk are share contracting and futures hedging. This paper explains the coexistence of these arrangements by showing that these will normally be complementary means of transferring risk. Share contracting by a purchaser with many producers can help diversify imperfectly correlated quantity risks. Futures contracts, on the other hand, hedge the systematic but not the idiosyncratic components of output risk. Thus, futures hedging helps to ameliorate the main disadvantage of multiple share contracting, an excessive loading of systematic risk on the purchaser. Copyright 1993 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819930 ... 0.CO%3B2-H&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: FUTURES VERSUS SHARE CONTRACTING AS MEANS OF DIVERSIFING OUTPUT RISK (1990)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:103:y:1993:i:418:p:620-38

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().