Rationality and the Role of Judgement in Macroeconomic Forecasting
Economic Journal, 1995, vol. 105, issue 429, 410-20
This paper examines the effects of judgmental adjustments on the rationality of macroeconomic forecasts. Published forecasts based on large-scale models are rarely purely model-based but often include extensive adjustments. Forecasters' adjustments tend to improve forecast accuracy but there is no evidence of their impact on the rationality of forecasts. Using series of revisions to forecasts, the author finds little evidence that published forecasts are excessively smooth in the Nordhaus (1987) sense but intercept corrections do appear to reduce the variation over time in purely model-based forecasts and to alter the underlying output-inflation trade-off implicit in the model. Copyright 1995 by Royal Economic Society.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819950 ... 0.CO%3B2-G&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
http://www.res.org.uk/datasets/vol105iss2.htm supporting dataset (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:105:y:1995:i:429:p:410-20
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen
More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().