EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Nominal Rigidities in Wage Setting by Rational Trade Unions

Jean-Pascal Benassy

Economic Journal, 1995, vol. 105, issue 430, 635-43

Abstract: Many rational wage setting schemes, such as the trade unions paradigm, are usually thought to lead to pure real rigidities. In this article, the author constructs a model where a rational trade union without any kind of money illusion sets wage schedules in an economy subject to real and monetary shocks. He makes the realistic assumption that wages can be conditioned on prices. It is found that, although the trade union has the option of fully insulating workers from nominal disturbances, it will rationally choose not to do so and, therefore, nominal rigidities will be present in the economy. Copyright 1995 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819950 ... 0.CO%3B2-D&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Nominal rigidities in wage setting by rational trade-unions (1993) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:105:y:1995:i:430:p:635-43

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:105:y:1995:i:430:p:635-43