EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Keynesian Multipliers and the Cost of Public Funds under Monopolistic Competition

Ben Heijdra () and Frederick (Rick) van der Ploeg

Economic Journal, 1996, vol. 106, issue 438, 1284-96

Abstract: The authors extend macroeconomic models of imperfect competition with Keynesian features to allow for nonunitary elasticities between leisure and consumption and the effect of product variety on multipliers and welfare. Provided preference for diversity is sufficiently strong, the real national income multiplier for a given rise in real public spending is larger under free than under restricted entry and exit of firms. This implies a procyclical real consumer wage. With lump-sum taxes, the marginal cost of public funds is below unity. Optimal public spending may be countercyclical. More priority for public goods raises the long-run cost of public funds. Copyright 1996 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819960 ... 0.CO%3B2-4&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:106:y:1996:i:438:p:1284-96

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:106:y:1996:i:438:p:1284-96