EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quantifying the Uruguay Round

Glenn Harrison, Thomas Rutherford () and David Tarr

Economic Journal, 1997, vol. 107, issue 444, 1405-30

Abstract: The effects of the Uruguay Round are quantified using a numerical general equilibrium model which incorporates increasing returns to scale, twenty-four regions, twenty-two commodities, and steady state growth effects. The authors conclude that the aggregate welfare gains from the Round are in the order of $96 billion per year in the short run, but could be as high as $171 billion per year in the long run after capital stocks have optimally adjusted. Despite these global gains, the authors identify some developing countries that lose from the Round in the short run. In the long run, almost all gain, and the Round will allow developing countries to gain further through their own unilateral liberalization. Copyright 1997 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (140)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819970 ... CO%3B2-%23&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Chapter: QUANTIFYING THE URUGUAY ROUND (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:107:y:1997:i:444:p:1405-30

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-07
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:107:y:1997:i:444:p:1405-30