Informal Family Insurance And The Design Of The Welfare State

Rafael Di Tella and Robert MacCulloch

Economic Journal, 2002, vol. 112, issue 481, 481-503

Abstract: We study unemployment benefit provision when the family also provides social insurance. In the benchmark case, more generous State transfers crowd out family risk--sharing one--for--one. An extension gives the State an advantage in enforcing transfers through taxes (whereas families rely on self--enforcement). More generous State transfers lead to more than one--for--one reductions in intra--family insurance, so that total transfers to the unemployed fall as the State"s generosity increases. This does not imply that the optimal size of the Welfare State is zero. Our results still hold when families are assumed to be better than the State at monitoring job search activities of unemployed. Copyright 2002 Royal Economic Society

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:112:y:2002:i:481:p:481-503

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().