EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise

Bernard van Praag and Barbara Baarsma

Economic Journal, 2005, vol. 115, issue 500, 224-246

Abstract: We assess the monetary value of the noise damage, caused by aircraft noise nuisance around Amsterdam Airport, as the sum of hedonic house price differentials and a residual cost component. The residual costs are assessed from a survey, including an ordinal life satisfaction scale, on which individual respondents have scored. The derived compensation scheme depends on, among other things, the objective noise level, income, the degree to which prices account for noise differences, and the presence of noise insulation. Copyright 2005 Royal Economic Society.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (389)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Using Happiness Surveys to value Intangibles; the Case of Airport Noise (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:115:y:2005:i:500:p:224-246

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:115:y:2005:i:500:p:224-246