EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Job Flow Dynamics and Firing Restrictions: Evidence from Europe

Julian Messina and Giovanna Vallanti

Economic Journal, 2007, vol. 117, issue 521, 279-301

Abstract: We exploit homogeneous firm level data of manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries to study the impact of firing restrictions on job flow dynamics across 14 European countries. Our results suggest that more stringent firing laws dampen the response of job destruction to the cycle, thus making job turnover less counter-cyclical. Moreover, stricter EPL reduces both the creation and destruction of jobs in declining sectors relative to expanding sectors, implying that faster trend growth attenuates the impact of firing costs on firm's hiring and firing decisions. Copyright 2007 The Author(s). Journal compilation Royal Economic Society 2007.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (138)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Job flow dynamics and firing restrictions: evidence from Europe (2006) Downloads
Working Paper: Job Flow Dynamics and Firing Restrictions: Evidence from Europe (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:117:y:2007:i:521:p:279-301

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:117:y:2007:i:521:p:279-301