EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Law of One Price without the Border: The Role of Distance versus Sticky Prices

Mario Crucini (), Mototsugu Shintani and Takayuki Tsuruga

Economic Journal, 2010, vol. 120, issue 544, 462-480

Abstract: We build a single-country, two-city, model with nominal rigidities and transport costs which predicts that variation of LOP deviations is lower for goods with infrequent price adjustment after controlling for distance. We adapt the Engel and Rogers (1996) regression to analyse Japanese retail prices at the city level and find that results are consistent with the theoretical predictions. The regression results also suggest that the distance equivalent of nominal rigidities can be as large as the 'width' of the border found in the literature on international LOP, casting doubt on casual interpretations of distance as a metric for market segmentation. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2010.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (57)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Law of One Price Without the Border: The Role of Distance Versus Sticky Prices (2009) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:120:y:2010:i:544:p:462-480

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:120:y:2010:i:544:p:462-480