EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Retrenchment Hypothesis and the Extension of the Franchise in England and Wales

Toke Aidt, Martin Daunton and Jayasri Dutta ()

Economic Journal, 2010, vol. 120, issue 547, 990-1020

Abstract: Does an extension of the voting franchise always increase public spending or can it be a source of retrenchment? We study this question in the context of public spending on health-related urban amenities in a panel of municipal boroughs from England and Wales in 1868, 1871 and 1886. We find evidence of a U-shaped relationship between spending on urban amenities and the extension of the local voting franchise. Our model of taxpayer democracy suggests that the retrenchment effect was related to enfranchisement of the middle class through nation-wide reforms and that these reforms might have been Pareto inferior in the average borough. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2010.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (62)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Retrenchment Hypothesis and the Extension of the Franchise in England and Wales (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:120:y:2010:i:547:p:990-1020

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:120:y:2010:i:547:p:990-1020