EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Macroeconomic Implications of Profit Sharing: Some Empirical Evidence

Sushil Wadhwani

Economic Journal, 1987, vol. 97, issue 388a, 171-83

Abstract: The Macroeconomic Implications of Profit Sharing: Some Empiricals paper attempts an empirical assessment of Weitzman's proposition that profit sharing provides an antidote to stagflation. Taking Japan as an example of a profit-sharing economy, the author shows that it does not have either lower cyclical variability of output or lower inflation than other industrial countries. The authors then reject the propositions that in a profit-sharing economy: (1) aggregate demand shocks have a smaller effect on output deviations and (2) import price shocks and wage push have a smaller effect on inflation. Therefore, one should be wary of the claim that the Japanese case supports Weitzman's model. Copyright 1987 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819879 ... 0.CO%3B2-3&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:97:y:1987:i:388a:p:171-83

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:97:y:1987:i:388a:p:171-83