EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Segmented Trends and Non-stationary Time Series

Peter Rappoport and Lucrezia Reichlin

Economic Journal, 1989, vol. 99, issue 395, 168-77

Abstract: Since the influential work of Charles R. Nelson and Charles Plosser (1982), many empirical studies have concluded that macroeconomic time series are difference stationary. This paper proposes the segmented trend model as an alternative in which the series is the sum of a nonstationary trend and a stationary cycle, and where the trend shows infrequent shifts. The paper proposes tests between the difference stationary, and segmented trends models and applies these to the data of Nelson and Plosser. In general, the results indicate that prices are difference stationary but quantities follow segmented trend processes. Copyright 1989 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (125)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819894 ... 0.CO%3B2-3&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Segmented trends and non-stationary time series (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:99:y:1989:i:395:p:168-77

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:99:y:1989:i:395:p:168-77