Election Goals and the Allocation of Campaign Resources

James M Snyder

Econometrica, 1989, vol. 57, issue 3, 637-60

Abstract: This paper compares the equilibrium behavior and outcomes in a model of two-party competition for legislative seats under two different assumptions about the parties' goals: (1) parties maximize the expected number of seats won, and (2) parties maximize the probability of winning a majority of the seats. The two goals may lead to qualitatively different behavior, and studying the differences yields insights into the relationship between the goals, and the role of asymmetries between the parties. Copyright 1989 by The Econometric Society.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (209)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9682%2819890 ... O%3B2-4&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:57:y:1989:i:3:p:637-60

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economet ... ordering-back-issues

Access Statistics for this article

Econometrica is currently edited by Guido Imbens

More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().