Commitment vs. Flexibility

Manuel Amador, Iván Werning and George-Marios Angeletos

Econometrica, 2006, vol. 74, issue 2, 365-396

Abstract: We study the optimal trade-off between commitment and flexibility in a consump- tion-savings model. Individuals expect to receive relevant information regarding tastes and thus they value the flexibility provided by larger choice sets. On the other hand, they also expect to suffer from temptation, with or without self-control, and thus they value the commitment afforded by smaller choice sets. The optimal commitment problem we study is to find the best subset of the individual's budget set. This problem leads to a principal-agent formulation. We find that imposing a minimum level of savings is always a feature of the solution. Necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for minimum-savings policies to completely characterize the solution. We also discuss other applications, such as the design of fiscal constitutions, the problem faced by a paternalist, and externalities. Copyright The Econometric Society 2006.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (115)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00666.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Commitment vs. Flexibility (2004)
Working Paper: Commitment Vs. Flexibility (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:74:y:2006:i:2:p:365-396

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economet ... ordering-back-issues

Access Statistics for this article

Econometrica is currently edited by Guido Imbens

More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().