The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?

Christopher Pissarides

Econometrica, 2009, vol. 77, issue 5, 1339-1369

Abstract: I discuss the failure of the canonical search and matching model to match the cyclical volatility in the job finding rate. I show that job creation in the model is influenced by wages in new matches. I summarize microeconometric evidence and find that wages in new matches are volatile and consistent with the model's key predictions. Therefore, explanations of the unemployment volatility puzzle have to preserve the cyclical volatility of wages. I discuss a modification of the model, based on fixed matching costs, that can increase cyclical unemployment volatility and is consistent with wage flexibility in new matches. Copyright 2009 The Econometric Society.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (713)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3982/ECTA7562 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer? (2007)
Working Paper: The unemployment volatility puzzle: is wage stickiness the answer? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:77:y:2009:i:5:p:1339-1369

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economet ... ordering-back-issues

Access Statistics for this article

Econometrica is currently edited by Guido Imbens

More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().