Trade War Shocks and Volatility Spillovers between Fossil Fuel Markets and Biofuel Feedstocks: Empirical Evidence from the U.S.-China Trade Dispute

Salokhiddin Avazkhodjaev (), Nont Dhiensiri (), Eshmurod Rakhimov (), Lobar Shayusupova () and Adiba Turaeva ()
Additional contact information
Salokhiddin Avazkhodjaev: College of Business and Technology, Northeastern Illinois University, USA
Nont Dhiensiri: College of Business and Technology, Northeastern Illinois University, USA
Eshmurod Rakhimov: Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Lobar Shayusupova: Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Adiba Turaeva: Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 719-732

Abstract: Volatility dynamics in fossil fuel and agricultural commodity markets are shaped by a complex interplay of geopolitical, macroeconomic, and policy shocks. This article examines volatility transmission and cross-market linkages between crude oil and major biofuel feedstock commodities - soybean, corn, canola, and sunflower - from 2016 to 2025. Using a VAR-GARCH-BEKK framework and volatility impulse response analysis, the study provides evidence on how disruptive events such as the U.S.-China trade war, Brexit, OPEC supply interventions, the COVID-19 pandemic, and renewed trade tensions influence variance and covariance across integrated energy-commodity systems. The results show that volatility transmission is a persistent structural feature, with shocks in the oil sector rapidly propagating into biofuel feedstocks through input-cost, substitution, and policy channels. Volatility shocks are asymmetric, with negative shocks - particularly trade disputes and geopolitical conflicts - exerting stronger effects than positive ones. Volatility impacts are also commodity-specific: soybean exhibits the greatest sensitivity due to its dual role in biofuel production and trade, while corn and sunflower respond more strongly to demand-side disturbances. Several exogenous shocks beyond the 2018 trade war generate volatility effects equal to or greater than its impact, highlighting the multidimensional drivers of systemic risk. These findings deepen understanding of cross-market dynamics in integrated commodity systems and underscore the need for coordinated policies, targeted stabilization tools, and forward- looking strategies incorporating climate transition risks and predictive analytics to enhance market resilience and safeguard food and energy security in an increasingly uncertain global environment.

Keywords: Biofuel Feedstock; Fossil Fuel; Volatility Spillovers; U.S.?China Trade War; Exogenous Shocks; Energy?Commodity Linkages (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/21787/9643 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2025:i:1:id:21787

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep

DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.21787

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy from International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Monica Sinhat ().