The comparative advantage fallacy and a rule for convergence

Anesa Ali and Esteban Perez Caldentey

Revista CEPAL, 2007

Abstract: The gains from trade argument is based on the principle of comparative advantage. However, this principle is predicated on "tacit"axioms, presenting an argument which supports a proposition different tothe one it purports to prove. This paper presents an alternative treatment,using a leader-follower model to show that free trade can in fact accentuatedifferences and growth disparities between countries. More importantly, itargues that the follower economy can catch up with the leader economyonly if the ratio between the income-elasticity of the follower country's exports to the rest of the world and the income-elasticity of its imports isgreater than the ratio between the induced productivity of the leader andthat of the follower country. This is our rule for convergence.

Date: 2007-12
Note: Includes bibliography
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/11236

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecr:col070:11236

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revista CEPAL from Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Biblioteca CEPAL ().