PROMPTING AS METHOD: DISCLOSURE THRESHOLDS FOR AI-ASSISTED LITERATURE SYNTHESIS

Dan Valeriu Voinea
Additional contact information
Dan Valeriu Voinea: University of Craiova

Annals of the University of Craiova for Journalism, Communication and Management, 2026, vol. 12, 23-32

Abstract: Large language models are now used throughout literature review workflows, including summarization, extraction support, comparison across studies, and manuscript preparation. Existing disclosure norms have responded mainly by asking authors to identify whether generative AI was used, which tool was used, and for what general purpose. These requirements are necessary, but they are insufficient when prompts and iterative model interactions contribute to the interpretive work of literature synthesis. This article develops a threshold-based framework for prompt disclosure in qualitative and mixed-methods research. Drawing on construct validity, qualitative audit-trail traditions, qualitative evidence synthesis, review-reporting standards, and recent AI disclosure guidance, it argues that prompts should be treated as methodological traces when they shape cross-paper relationships, explanatory claims, causal hierarchies, typologies, metaphors, or adopted interpretive frames. In such cases, disclosure should extend beyond the prompt text itself to include the interaction path, supplied context, model and settings where available, decision points, human evaluation criteria, and the rationale by which model-generated interpretations were accepted, rejected, or revised. Lighter disclosure remains appropriate for grammar editing, formatting, translation used only for comprehension, unused brainstorming, and descriptive summary that does not enter synthesis. The proposed checklist links disclosure burden to interpretive consequence rather than to AI use as such. It treats prompt disclosure as an auditability practice that strengthens construct-validity warrants in AI-mediated knowledge production, without promising exact reproducibility.

Keywords: AI-assisted literature synthesis; prompt disclosure; construct validity; audit trail; qualitative methods; large language models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://aucjc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/aucjcm-12-23-32.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edt:aucjcm:v:12:y:2026:p:23-32

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21032799

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of the University of Craiova for Journalism, Communication and Management is currently edited by Dan Valeriu Voinea

More articles in Annals of the University of Craiova for Journalism, Communication and Management from Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dan Valeriu Voinea ().