Did Berle and Means get it wrong? Reflections on Thorstein Veblen, Paul Samuelson, and ‘Corporate Strategy Financialized’

Mervyn K. Lewis

Accounting forum, 2010, vol. 34, issue 3, 222-227

Abstract: This article has two main aims. One is to reconcile Berle and Means’ conclusions in 1932 about management control in large US corporations with the earlier views of Thorstein Veblen, who from much the same starting point reached a seemingly contrary position. The explanation offered in terms of changes in financial control puts many subsequent developments in a different light. The other aim, drawing on the views of Paul Samuelson about product market competition, is to question the precise contribution of the ‘financialization of corporate strategy’ to the institution of ‘the era of shareholder value’.

Keywords: Ownership and control; Agency theory; Shareholder value; Financial control; Competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S015599821000030X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:accfor:v:34:y:2010:i:3:p:222-227

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2010.08.003

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting forum is currently edited by Glen Lehman

More articles in Accounting forum from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().