Quantifying crop water stress factors from soil water measurements in a limited irrigation experiment

S.A. Saseendran, T.J. Trout, L.R. Ahuja, L. Ma, G.S. McMaster, D.C. Nielsen, A.A. Andales, J.L. Chávez and J. Ham

Agricultural Systems, 2015, vol. 137, issue C, 191-205

Abstract: A correct simulation of crop responses to water stress is essential for a system model. In this study, we investigated three methods of quantifying water deficit stresses based on soil water measurements and their effects on simulating grain yield, biomass and canopy cover of corn (Zea Mays L.). Experimental data were collected for six irrigation treatments designed to replace 40 to 100% of potential crop evapotranspiration (ETc) losses during the growing season, from 2008 to 2011 near Greeley, Colorado in a sandy loam soil (Limited Irrigation Research Farm, LIRF). Water available for plant uptake (PAW, plant available water) and the maximum PAW (MAW) in the soil were calculated for a constant 1 m soil profile from 45 days after planting till maturity. Water deficit stress factors were calculated as ratios of (1) PAW to alfalfa reference crop evapotranspiration (ETr) (WSF1), (2) PAW to MAW (WSF2), and (3) WSF2 to ETr (WSF3). Average WSF1, WSF2 and WSF3 over the growing season were related to end of the season grain yield, biomass, and fraction canopy cover measurements. These stress factors were implemented in the RZWQM2 cropping system model and the calibrated results compared with those obtained from using current stress factors in CERES-maize module in RZWQM2. The best simulation of the measured grain yields, biomass and LAI was obtained using WSF3. The modified model was also tested for simulating dryland and limited irrigation studies at Akron, CO, and irrigated corn in a sandy loam soil at Zaragoza, Spain and in a sandy soil at Gainesville, Florida, USA. In general, WSF3 gave slightly better simulations of grain yields, biomass and LAI than WSF2, WSF1 and the original stress factor.

Keywords: Yield vs. water; Canopy cover vs. water; Cropping system models; Limited irrigation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X14001590
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:191-205

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.11.005

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().