Environmental and economic performance of beef farming systems with different feeding strategies in southern Brazil

Farahnaz Pashaei Kamali, Aart van der Linden, Miranda P.M. Meuwissen, Guilherme Cunha Malafaia, Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink and Imke J.M. de Boer

Agricultural Systems, 2016, vol. 146, issue C, 70-79

Abstract: Beef production is one of the contributors to emission of pollutants to the environment, and increasingly competes for natural resources. Beef producers can improve their environmental performance by adopting alternative feeding strategies. Adoption of alternative feeding strategies, however, might negatively impact farm profitability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the environmental and economic performance of four beef farming systems with different feeding strategies in southern Brazil: grazing on natural pasture (NP); grazing on improved pasture (IP); grazing on natural pasture and crop residues (CR); and grazing on natural pasture and feedlot fattening (FL). Environmental indicators used to compare these farming systems were global warming potential (GWP), fossil energy use, and land occupation per kilogram live weight (LW). Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to quantify environmental indicators from cradle-to-farm gate. The indicator for economic performance was operating profit per farm. The IP system had lower GWP (18.7kgCO2-eq.·kg−1LW) and land occupation (37m2·kg−1LW) than other systems, whereas its fossil energy use (19.3MJ·kg−1LW) was higher. CR had the highest operating profit (1,567,800R$·farm−1) of the four systems, followed by the IP system (616,400R$·farm−1). Operating profit in the CR system was mainly from crop production (88%). The GWP of the CR system (26.8kgCO2-eq.·kg−1LW) was similar to the GWP of the NP system (27.3kgCO2-eq.·kg−1LW). Operating profit of the FL system (148,100R$·farm−1) was lower than in the NP system (184,400R$·farm−1). The outcomes of this research suggest that IP is a promising system to improve GWP, land occupation, and operating profit, whereas CR has the potential to improve economic performance of whole farms in southern Brazil.

Keywords: Pasture quality; Feed efficiency; Greenhouse gas; Life cycle assessment; Operating profit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16300634
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:146:y:2016:i:c:p:70-79

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.003

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().