Smallholder preference and agroecosystem service trade-offs: A case study in Xinzheng County, China

Ruihua Li, Hua Lin, Haipeng Niu, Yuqi Chen, Suxia Zhao and Liangxin Fan

Agricultural Systems, 2019, vol. 168, issue C, 19-26

Abstract: The provision of agroecosystem services (ESs) is directly influenced by the production goals and activities preferred by smallholders. However, the relationship between smallholder preferences and ES provision has yet to be established. This study surveyed the preferences of smallholders for agricultural production goals and managements in the North China Plain, China. The DeNitrification–DeComposition model was utilised to derive ES indicators under annual winter wheat–maize, winter wheat–peanut and biennial mixed rotation (i.e. winter wheat–maize and winter wheat–peanut rotation) systems. The combination of socio-economic and bio-physical modelling data was used to establish a quantitative link between ES compositions and smallholder preferences. Results show that smallholder preferences follow the order of traditional cropping system > low labour input > disaster alleviation > high income generation > food provision > soil fertilisation > landscape beautification > crop diversity. Preferences for high income generation, low labour input, disaster alleviation and crop diversity remarkably affect the cropping system choices of smallholders and the composition of ES provision. The preference for disaster alleviation is associated with high agricultural income and soil organic carbon (SOC), whereas that for low labour input is associated with low agricultural income and SOC accumulation. The ES trade-offs occurring in the switch from the preferences for high income generation, disaster alleviation and crop diversity to that for low labour input decrease the agricultural income and SOC sequestration. The analysis of the effects of smallholder preferences on trade-offs in ESs should consider soil types because agroecosystems with loamy and sandy soil types exhibit different compositions of ES provision under the same preference.

Keywords: Smallholder; Preference; Trade-off; Ecosystem service; DNDC (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X17301804
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:168:y:2019:i:c:p:19-26

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.10.002

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().