EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Prediction of nitrogen excretion in buffalo production systems using dietary and animal variables

Amlan Kumar Patra, Kaushik Pal and Melody Lalhriatpuii

Agricultural Systems, 2020, vol. 182, issue C

Abstract: Presently, there are no models for predicting nitrogen excretion (NE) in buffaloes, which are required for preparation of inventory of NE. Thus, this study aimed to develop statistical models to predict NE from animal and dietary characteristic variables. A dataset of 481 treatment means from 143 publications was constructed, which contained at least NE and nitrogen intake (NI) data. Simple and multiple regression models were developed using the datasets containing all animals, growing or lactating buffaloes. The models that predicted faecal NE (g/d) with high precision and accuracy were faecal NE (g/d) = 13.4 (±3.30) + body weight (BW; kg) × 0.023 (±0.0083) – crude protein (CP) content of diet (g/kg) × 0.080 (±0.0211) + NI (g/d) × 0.288 (±0.0148) [RMSPE = 26.5%, with 98% of mean square prediction error (MSPE) being random error; R2 = 0.77] for all animals, and faecal NE (g/d) = 17.7 (±4.04) + BW (kg) × 0.033 (±0.0167) – ADG (kg/d) × 10.2 (±2.99) – CP (g/kg) × 0.052 (±0.026) + NI (g/d) × 0.231 (±0.0324) [RMSPE = 27.9%, with 96.4% of MSPE being random error; R2 = 0.49] for growing animals only. The best predicted regression equations for urinary NE (g/d) = −10.8 (±5.15) + BW (kg) × 0.019 (±0.0129) + CP (g/kg) × 0.056 (±0.0298) + NI (g/d) × 0.334 (±0.0206) [RMSPE = 45.5%, with 90% of MSPE from random error; R2 = 0.65] for the dataset containing all animals; and urinary NE (g/d) = 4.23 (±3.89) – BW (kg) × 0.039 (±0.0188) – ADG (kg/d) × 13.2 (±4.51) + NI (g/d) × 0.421 (±0.0313) [RMSPE = 33.2%, with 92.4% of MSPE accounting random error; R2 = 0.61] for only growing animals. In lactating buffaloes only, no models containing milk yield as a predictor were reliable for predicting NE perhaps due to paucity of studies included in the dataset. Prediction models for urinary NE had usually greater RMSPE compared with the models for faecal NE. The equations developed in the present study were found suitable for estimation of NE factors from different categories of buffaloes with different BW, ADG and feeding conditions. The models developed in the present study would be useful for preparation of global inventory of NE and separate estimation of urinary and faecal NE in buffaloes.

Keywords: Buffalo; Faeces; Nitrogen excretion; Regression equation; Statistical model; Urine (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X19307942
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:182:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19307942

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102845

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:182:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19307942