Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance

D.F. Chapman, S.N. Kenny, D. Beca and I.R. Johnson

Agricultural Systems, 2008, vol. 97, issue 3, 108-125

Abstract: The dairy industry in southern Australia relies on perennial ryegrass pasture to supply 60-70% of the diet of lactating cows. Improvements in the amount and quality of home-grown forage used for dairy cow feeding are critical for further productivity gains in the industry. A modeling approach was used to estimate the effects of changing the forage system on farm business profit. Base models (using 100% of farm area in perennial ryegrass pasture) were constructed for above-average (Top 40%) and high performing (Top 10%) farm types typical of two locations: Terang in southwest Victoria and Ellinbank in Gippsland, eastern Victoria. These models were then re-simulated using different forage base options such as: oversowing annual ryegrass, winter crops (annual ryegrass monoculture, winter cereal grown for whole crop silage), summer crops (grazing brassicas, maize), combinations of these (double cropping), or summer shoulder pasture (notionally based on tall fescue) on between 10% and 100% of farm area. Estimated total home-grown forage consumption ranged between 6.7 and 10.2 t DM/ha/year for Terang and 7.8 and 11.9 t DM/ha/year for Ellinbank. Within farm types at Terang, the amount of home-grown forage consumed explained between 30% and 45% of the variation in operating profit. The models predicted that profit improvements of $70-$100 per hectare per additional tonne of home-grown forage consumed are possible from changing the forage base. Oversowing annual ryegrass led to greater forage supply, but only at times when pasture availability was largely adequate to meet current herd requirements therefore additional feed was not used as cost-effectively as other options. By contrast, the summer shoulder pasture type shifted the seasonal distribution of forage supply further into summer compared to perennial ryegrass, and led to higher amounts of pasture in the diet and greater profitability. Double cropping systems also appeared capable of increasing operating profit and total home-grown forage consumption. Increasing home-grown forage consumption and profit by using some of the alternative pastures and forage crops investigated here requires better information on crop/pasture agronomy, management and feeding, and greater decision-making and management input compared to current systems.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(08)00002-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:97:y:2008:i:3:p:108-125

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().