EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Biosolid and distillery effluent amendments to Irish short rotation coppiced willow plantations: Impacts on groundwater quality and soil

Paul Galbally, Declan Ryan, Colette C. Fagan, John Finnan, Jim Grant and Kevin McDonnell

Agricultural Water Management, 2013, vol. 116, issue C, 193-203

Abstract: The impact of landspreading organic byproduct (OB) on the quality of groundwater (GW) and soil underlying short rotation coppiced willow plantations was assessed. Organic byproduct, namely biosolid (BS) and distillery effluent (DE), was spread on six plots (each with a plot area of 0.059ha) at OB treatment-rates of 100%, 50% and 0%. The OB treatment rate was defined by the maximum permissible soil-P load defined in Irish regulation. Groundwater was sampled each month and tested for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), NO3, PO43, total soluble phosphorous (TSP), K and six heavy metals (HMs) Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb, Ni, and Zn. Results were assessed in relation to Irish GW threshold values (GTVs), to assess overall quality using a “well bottom” approach. The background concentration of GW K and GW P (established in early 2008, prior to all OB spreading) were above permissible Irish statutory limits, in all cases. There was evidence of percolation of K and TSP to GW; K and PO43 concentrations breached GTVs across all plots. There was also evidence of percolation of Cu through soil profile, though Cu GW concentration did not breach GTV, and no risk to GW quality is necessarily implied. A potential (though small) risk of P- and K-percolation could impact GW quality in commercially scaled-up plantations; however, risk to GW quality from NO3, Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb, Ni, and Zn leaching in soil are minimal. Sites considered for energy crop should be assessed for soil conditions, and vulnerability to leaching, before OB amendment programs are initiated. The study was conducted over two years; the longer term impact of applications of BS and DE on soil organic-matter content, salinity and pH (and subsequent loss through soil profile) should be assessed. The implication of scaling up test-bed sized applications to larger commercial plantation scales needs to be considered.

Keywords: Nutrient-loss; Soil percolation; Heavy-metal leaching; Energy crops; Bio-amendments; Organic byproducts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741200203X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:116:y:2013:i:c:p:193-203

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.07.010

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:116:y:2013:i:c:p:193-203