EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Simulating the long term impact of nitrate mitigation scenarios in a pilot study basin

Sylvain Ferrant, Patrick Durand, Eric Justes, Jean-Luc Probst and José-Miguel Sanchez-Perez

Agricultural Water Management, 2013, vol. 124, issue C, 85-96

Abstract: The agro-hydrological model TNT2 was used to explore for a period of 14 years (1987–2001) the likely consequences of mitigation scenarios on nitrate contamination of the stream water in a small agricultural catchment. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) historically designed and implemented in 1992 and two devised agricultural scenarios (catch crop (CC) implementation and a global reduction of N fertilizer) are evaluated in term of nitrate contamination in the environment. Two of the BMPs consist in implementing natural strips of Poplar and rye-grass strips (5 meters large) along stream and ditches and the third is a delay in the burial of wheat straws (from August to October). Simulations indicated that natural strips implementation would lead to a slight decrease of Nitrate Fluxes (NF) in river by respectively 3.3% and 6.6% for rye-grass and poplar strips: a benefit associated to the non fertilization of strips area. Denitrification has not been particularly disrupted in such areas. The delay in the burial of wheat straw in autumn decreases annual mineralization rate and annual plant uptake (by respectively 9 and 13kgNha−1y−1) but increases denitrification fluxes by 6kgNha−1y−1. This would lead to a slight decrease by 6% of NF in stream (equivalent to 3.3mgNO3−l−1) and an average decrease of the following sunflower yield by 27%. The global reduction of fertilization by 10% would decreased NF in stream by 13.8% (equivalent to 8mgNO3−l−1), with a global decrease by 8kgNha−1y−1 of plant uptake. The cumulative effect of BMPs and CC would have together lead to a decrease of nitrate concentration from 57.5 to 46.6mgNO3−l−1 reaching the UE environmental quality objectives (below 50mgNO3−l−1). Spring crops yield following CC would have been penalized and the decrease of NF is balanced by an increase of denitrification fluxes in the environment contributing to release of N2O, a greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere.

Keywords: Agricultural scenario; Nitrate transfer; Small catchment modeling; Best management practices; Catch crops; Agro-hydrology; TNT2 model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377413000917
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:124:y:2013:i:c:p:85-96

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.023

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:124:y:2013:i:c:p:85-96