EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluating fluxes in Histosols for water management in lettuce: A comparison of mass balance, evapotranspiration and lysimeter methods

Jonathan A. Lafond, Éliane Bergeron Piette, Jean Caron and Guillaume Théroux Rancourt

Agricultural Water Management, 2014, vol. 135, issue C, 73-83

Abstract: The evaluation of downward water fluxes in Histosols is critical for water budget and irrigation studies in natural and cultivated wetlands. By analyzing water fluxes in cultivated organic soils, our study aimed to (i) compare drainage water fluxes measured using in situ lysimeters to fluxes estimated by three indirect methods, specifically, a simplified water balance, a water balance including soil water storage changes, and a method based on the Buckingham–Darcy law; and (ii) investigate water flux mechanisms using a bromide tracer in the same lysimeters. In 2008–2009, three sites were each set up with four drainage lysimeters equipped with water content probes and tensiometers. Bromide was applied over each lysimeter at the beginning of the lettuce growing cycle. Daily outflow water volumes were measured and solute samples were collected. The results showed that measured cumulative drainage was very low (0–40.2mm) compared to water input (30–128mm). A rupture point in the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at matric potentials around −4.5 to −6kPa, combined with the stratified profile of the organic layers, may in part explain these observations. The measured water fluxes were also significantly lower (by 1.2 to 1255.3 times) than the estimations made with the three indirect methods. Finally, the analyses of soil and outflow bromide concentrations confirmed the low fluxes through the lysimeters and revealed an accumulation at the surface layer interface (at a depth of about 0.3m), indicating that water perched in the profile and suggesting that preferential flow occurred, leading to episodic solute leaching. Direct evaluation of water and solute fluxes are needed in such soils, as all three methods presented important biases.

Keywords: Muck; Lysimeter; Soil moisture; Water flux; Drainage; Hydraulic conductivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414000031
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:135:y:2014:i:c:p:73-83

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.016

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:135:y:2014:i:c:p:73-83