Least limiting water range as affected by soil texture and cropping system

A. Safadoust, P. Feizee, A.A. Mahboubi, B. Gharabaghi, M.R. Mosaddeghi and B. Ahrens

Agricultural Water Management, 2014, vol. 136, issue C, 34-41

Abstract: In this study the least limiting water range (LLWR) and associated measurements (water content at field capacity, θFC, wilting point, θPWP, air filled porosity, θAFP, and mechanical resistance, θSMR) were tested on two soils of clay loam (CL) and sandy loam (SL), each under long-term cultivation with either wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) or alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Water content at field capacity (θFC) and wilting point (θPWP) decreased slightly with an increase in bulk density (Db) in clay loam soils under wheat and alfalfa, whereas in sandy loam soils under the same cultivation, both values of θFC and θPWP strongly increased by increments of Db. The variation of LLWR was negatively related to Db in clay loam soils under wheat and alfalfa cultivation. The LLWR increased up to Db, equal to 1.56Mgm−3 (when θFC=θ10kPa) and to 1.60Mgm−3 (when θFC=θ33kPa) in sandy loam under alfalfa, and 1.42Mgm−3 (both values of θFC) in sandy loam under wheat; LLWR then declined sharply with increasing Db. The highest value of LLWR was observed in the ranges of 0.034–0.167cm3cm−3 (when θFC=θ10kPa) and of 0.034–0.119cm3cm−3 (when θFC=θ33kPa) in clay loam under wheat. The lowest value of LLWR was observed in between 0.137 and 0.151cm3cm−3 (when θFC=θ10kPa) and between 0.087 and 0.111cm3cm−3 (when θFC=θ33kPa) in sandy loam under wheat. Linear regressions (Stepwise) showed that LLWR (when θFC=θ10kPa) was related to bulk density, clay, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and organic carbon (OC) contents (r2=0.79). Considering θFC=θ33kPa, LLWR was related to bulk density, clay and OC contents (r2=0.48)

Keywords: Least limiting water range; Available water content; Air filled porosity; Field capacity; Mechanical resistance; Wilting point (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414000237
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:34-41

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.007

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().