EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Monitoring of nitrate leaching during flush flooding events in a coarse-textured floodplain soil

Osvaldo Salazar, Juan Vargas, Francisco Nájera, Oscar Seguel and Manuel Casanova

Agricultural Water Management, 2014, vol. 146, issue C, 218-227

Abstract: The demand for foods in central Chile is increasing and arable land is expanding rapidly onto floodplain soils, which are being cleared for maize cultivation. After harvest, a significant amount of residual nitrogen (N) may be still present in the soil in autumn–winter, when a high risk of nitrate leaching (NL) is expected due to occasional flooding events. Determining nitrate (NO3−) movement through the vadose zone is essential for studying the impact of agricultural practices on surface water quality. This study focused on understanding the processes of NO3− leaching in a floodplain environment and compared the effectiveness of four different methods: soil coring (T0), an observation well (T1), ceramic suction cup lysimeters (T2) and a capillary lysimeter (FullStop™ wetting front detector) (T3) for monitoring NL using an infiltration cylinder to simulate the conditions generated during flush flooding events during autumn–winter season in a typical coarse-textured alluvial floodplain soil. The comparison showed that T0 and T3 can be used for monitoring NL during flush flooding events during autumn–winter season in stratified coarse-textured floodplain soils, whereas T1 and T2 are not appropriate for these site conditions. A correlation was found between NO3 and soluble salt (Cl− concentration and EC) only in the first measurements after the dry summer period. The results of this study suggest that most of the surplus N could be leached by excessive irrigation during the crop growing season (spring–summer), while a lower amount of residual N may still be present in the soil in autumn–winter available to be lost by NL during flush flooding events. Overall the two monitored flushing events could have leached around 6% of the total NO3–N load. There was no significant effect of sampler devices on saturated hydraulic conductivity.

Keywords: Nonpoint source pollution; Sampling methods; Saturated hydraulic conductivity; Water quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414002534
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:218-227

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.08.014

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:218-227