Uncertainty assessment of the agro-hydrological SWAP model application at field scale: A case study in a dry region

Mojtaba Shafiei, Bijan Ghahraman, Bahram Saghafian, Kamran Davary, Saket Pande and Majid Vazifedoust

Agricultural Water Management, 2014, vol. 146, issue C, 324-334

Abstract: Uncertainty analysis can provide useful insights into the sources and effects of uncertainty for decision makers to achieve the goals of reliability and sustainability in water management. This study presents parameters uncertainty of a physically based soil–water–atmosphere–plant (SWAP) model and its effect on model prediction within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework for two irrigated agricultural fields in a dry region of Iran. To simulate soil water dynamics of the two fields, the SWAP model is calibrated using soil moisture observation data. The results demonstrate that predictive uncertainty in soil moisture during the growing season in both fields is relatively small and a good model performance is achieved. Parameter uncertainty analysis of soil hydraulic parameters showed that in spite of similarity of soil texture in both the fields, the estimated parameters (i.e. posterior distribution) exhibit different behaviors. This was because of the dynamics of soil structure which varies considerably within cultivated fields during the growing season. Moreover, the simulated water balance fluxes (actual evapotranspiration and deep percolation) indicate that in irrigated agricultural fields in dry regions, the precision of actual evapotranspiration predicted by the SWAP model is high (i.e. a high degree of model reliability is achieved). However, deep percolation fluxes show higher variation (lower precision) and are more sensitive to soil hydraulic conductivity parameterization. Finally, this study reveals the importance of uncertainty analysis to estimate the degree of reliability associated with model predictions as an important first step for providing decision makers with realistic information about the models outputs.

Keywords: Soil water balance; Predictive uncertainty; Reliability; GLUE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414002790
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:324-334

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.008

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().