EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Nutrient leaching in an Ultisol cultivated with sugarcane

P.J. Ghiberto, P.L. Libardi and P.C.O. Trivelin

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 148, issue C, 141-149

Abstract: Solute leaching below the crop-rooting zone represents not only a valuable loss of nutrients for the plant, but also a potential pollution source of groundwater. The objective of this work was to quantify nutrient-leaching losses at 0.9m depth in an Ultisol that was cultivated with sugarcane, located in the county of Jaboticabal-SP, Brazil. The following ions were evaluated: nitrite, nitrate, ammonium, sulfate, phosphate, calcium, magnesium and potassium. The first ratoon cycle was monitored from November 16, 2006, to July 9, 2007. The experimental design was organized as four random blocks and three treatments: T1: without fertilizer; T2: 100kgha−1 of N and 114kgha−1 of S; and T3: 150kgha−1 of N and 172kgha−1 of S. To determine the fate of the N-fertilizer and S-fertilizer, four microplots were installed, in which 2.15% atoms of 15N- and 10.5% atoms of 34S-enriched ammonium sulfate were applied. The input and output of anions and cations were quantified from the flux density of water and the ion concentration. The NO3−, K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ concentrations in the soil increased in January following both rainfall and drainage. The leaching of N was between 3.9 and 34.9kgha−1. The N leached derived from the 100kgha−1 applied N fertilizer was 22.5kgha−1. The S leached was between 4.6 and 8.4kgha−1. From the 114kgha−1 S applied as fertilizer the leaching was 0.480kgha−1. The maximum leaching of P, K, Ca, and Mg were 1.2, 53.6, 135.7 and 39.8kgha−1, respectively. From the results, it is not possible to determine whether the local groundwater will be contaminated, but caution should be taken to maintain soil quality by reducing the leaching loss of nutrients.

Keywords: 15N and 34S isotope; Saccharum spp.; Pollution; Sustainable management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414003187
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:141-149

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.027

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:141-149