EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Storm flow dynamics and loads of fecal bacteria associated with ponds in southern piedmont and coastal plain watersheds with animal agriculture

Michael B. Jenkins, M. Paige Adams, Dinku M. Endale, Dwight S. Fisher, Richard Lowrance, G. Larry Newton and George Vellidis

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 148, issue C, 97-105

Abstract: Storm events that increase flow rates can disturb sediments and produce overland runoff in watersheds with animal agriculture, and, thus, can increase surface water concentrations of fecal bacteria and risk to public health. We tested the hypothesis that strategically designed and placed ponds in watersheds with animal agriculture would attenuate downstream fluxes of fecal bacteria. We measured concentrations and fluxes of fecal indicator bacteria (commensal Escherichia coli and fecal enterococci) and manure pathogens (Salmonella and E. coli 0157:H7) in in- and outflows of Bishop Pond in the Southern Piedmont of Georgia during three storm events and in- and outflow concentrations and fluxes of fecal indicator bacteria at Ponds A and C in the Coastal Plain of Georgia during two storm events. Mean concentrations and fluxes of fecal indicator bacteria associated with pond in- and outflow during hydrograph rise, peak, fall, and 5-days after peak flow at Bishop Pond were significantly greater than their mean base flow concentrations and fluxes. In storm flow Bishop Pond significantly reduced the outflow concentrations and fluxes of fecal indicator bacteria compared with corresponding inflow measurements. Unlike fecal indicator bacteria, Bishop Pond appeared not to reduce outflow concentrations and fluxes of Salmonella or E. coli 0157:H7. At Ponds A and C in the Coastal Plain mean in- and outflow concentrations and fluxes of the fecal indicator bacteria associated with the hydrograph rise and peak flows of the storms were not different. Bishop Pond, with a length to width ratio of 3.3, attenuated downstream fluxes of fecal bacteria. In contrast, Ponds A and C were not effective at reducing downstream fluxes of fecal bacteria under storm flow conditions. The ineffectiveness of Ponds A and C may be attributed to their having length to width ratios of 1.2 and 2.5, respectively, both of which are below the minimum for effective pond performance. Our results indicated that in the humid Southeast an appropriately placed and configured pond in watersheds with animal agriculture can reduce storm flow loads of fecal indicator bacteria but not necessarily pathogenic E. coli 0157:H7.

Keywords: E. coli 0157:H7; Fecal indicator bacteria; Ponds; Salmonella; Storm flow; Watersheds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414003126
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:97-105

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.022

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:97-105