Evapotranspiration partitioning and water use efficiency of switchgrass and biomass sorghum managed for biofuel

Yohannes Tadesse Yimam, Tyson E. Ochsner and Vijaya Gopal Kakani

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 155, issue C, 40-47

Abstract: Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and biomass sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) are two candidate bioenergy crops for the US Southern Great Plains region. In this water-limited region, there is a need to partition evapotranspiration (ET) and to determine the water use efficiency (WUE) of these potential feedstocks. Both crops were grown in a field plot experiment at Stillwater, OK. Soil water content measurements were made by neutron probe every two weeks to a depth of 2.0m in 0.2-m intervals over the course of three growing seasons. Growing season ET was estimated as the difference between growing season precipitation and change in root zone soil water storage. Evapotranspiration was partitioned by measuring canopy interception using interception trays and estimating soil evaporation using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method. Transpiration was calculated as ET minus soil evaporation and canopy interception. Transpiration was the largest component of ET; however, soil evaporation and canopy interception accounted for 28% of growing season ET for switchgrass and 42% for biomass sorghum. Although the non-productive losses were greater from biomass sorghum, WUE values of 9–49kgha−1mm−1 based on ET and 22–83kgha−1mm−1 based on transpiration were observed for biomass sorghum, which were greater than the WUE values of switchgrass, 8–21kgha−1mm−1 based on ET and 12–28kgha−1mm−1 based on transpiration. These results demonstrate that biomass sorghum is a candidate feedstock with potential to achieve greater WUE than switchgrass at this location; however, other factors such as economics and ecosystem services should also be considered.

Keywords: Soil evaporation; Canopy interception; Transpiration; Non-productive losses; Switchgrass; Biomass sorghum (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377415000931
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:155:y:2015:i:c:p:40-47

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.018

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().