Evapotranspiration, water productivity and crop coefficients for irrigated sunflower in the U.S. Southern High Plains

Terry A. Howell, Steven R. Evett, Judy A. Tolk, Karen S. Copeland and Thomas H. Marek

Agricultural Water Management, 2015, vol. 162, issue C, 33-46

Abstract: Sunflower is a diverse crop grown for oil or confectionary uses in the U.S. Southern High Plains, often under irrigation, but its water use, water productivity (water use efficiency) and crop coefficients for irrigation scheduling are not well known for the Texas High Plains. Crop water use (evapotranspiration or ET) was measured in 2009 and 2011 in two 4.4-ha fields using two precision 9m2 weighing lysimeters containing 2.3-m deep monoliths of Pullman clay loam soil. The fields were irrigated with a lateral move sprinkler system with nozzles about 1.7–1.8m above the ground and 1.5-m apart. The sunflower ET averaged 638mm; seed yields averaged 308gm−2; and the lysimeter crop water productivity averaged 0.49kg (dry seed+hull) m−3. Even in the 2011 record drought season with limited soil water reserves, seed yield and oil content appeared similar to those for the 2009 season with greater precipitation and less irrigation requirement. Also, a month later sowing date in 2011, which might occur following an early cotton crop failure, did not appear to greatly affect ET, crop coefficients, or sunflower seed yields. The basal crop coefficients were 0.15 for the initial period after planting (Kcbini) and 1.22 for the peak water use rate at full cover (Kcbmid) based on the daily ASCE short “grass” reference ET (ETos) and FAO 56 climate adjustment. The Kcbmid based on the ASCE taller, rougher “alfalfa” Reference ET (ETrs) was 0.80. Using a thermal-time base (growing degree day) for the crop coefficient did not greatly improve the representation of the crop coefficient. Comparisons of ASCE reference ET computed using hourly versus daily summary data, and for short and tall reference crops, to each other and to FAO 56 reference ET showed that the relationships between reference ET methods varied significantly from one year to the next. This climate effect means that conversions of crop coefficients from one standard ET formulation to another will not be straightforward.

Keywords: Sunflower; Evapotranspiration; Reference ET; Crop coefficient; Growing degree days; Yield; Water use efficiency; Sprinkler irrigation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377415300743
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:162:y:2015:i:c:p:33-46

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.008

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().