Responses of several soil and plant indicators to post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation in olive trees and their potential for irrigation scheduling

L. Martín Agüero Alcaras, M. Cecilia Rousseaux and Peter S. Searles

Agricultural Water Management, 2016, vol. 171, issue C, 10-20

Abstract: The response of olive trees to deficit irrigation during post-harvest has been little evaluated because low rainfall often precludes the need to irrigate at this phenological stage in the Mediterranean Basin where olive is mostly cultivated. In many growing areas of Argentina, the lower latitude and continental climate leads to harvesting table olives in mid-summer when evapotranspiration is still high and rainfall is low. We assessed the responses of soil moisture and several plant-based indicators to post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) in two growing seasons in order to: 1) determine the responses of the indicators to a range of irrigation levels; 2) elucidate the relationships between the different soil and plant variables; and 3) evaluate the appropriateness of the indicators for scheduling irrigation. Three RDI treatments (66, 33, 0% crop evapotranspiration; ETc) and a control (100% ETc) were applied for 75days from mid-summer to mid-fall in a cv. ‘Manzanilla fina’ orchard during 2009 and 2010. The treatments received irrigation equivalent to the control during the rest of the season. Soil relative extractable water (REW%), midday stem water potential (Ψs), leaf conductance (gl), sap flow, and trunk diameter variations were the variables evaluated. The RDI treatments generated a wide range of REW values (0–125%) with all of the plant indicators being affected to some degree. Midday stem water potential increased linearly with REW until it reached a break point at 48% REW, above which Ψs maintained a plateau at −1.75MPa. The increase in maximum trunk diameter (MXTD) showed strong relationships with REW, Ψs, and gl. Trunk growth rate (TGR) showed a very early response to water-withholding in both seasons, and trunk growth decreased along with Ψs until it reached a constant negative growth rate of −12μmd−1at a Ψs of −2.7MPa. Trunk maximum daily shrinkage was much less responsive to irrigation than either MXTD or TGR. Our results during post-harvest RDI in an arid region suggest that automated soil moisture sensors can be used to schedule irrigation at different water stress levels if reliable soil moisture values can be measured, and indicate that a continuous recording of trunk diameter has sufficient enough potential for irrigation scheduling that further investigation of MXTD and TGR is warranted.

Keywords: Deficit irrigation; Post-harvest; Soil moisture; Stem water potential; Trunk growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416300828
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:171:y:2016:i:c:p:10-20

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.006

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().